Top criminal advocates in Chennai

 Are you looking for top criminal advocates in Chennai? Rajendra Law Office offers the best legal support with a team of senior criminal lawyers. Our offices in Mogappair and George Town are conveniently located near Madras High Court, making it easy for clients to avail of our services. We have been providing legal counsel and timely advice for matters such as anticipatory bail for years. With our experienced attorneys at the Supreme Court, we ensure that all our clients get the best and most reliable legal representation.

In conclusion,Rajendra Law Office is an experienced and reliable team of criminal lawyers in Chennai that can provide exceptional legal support to individuals in need. From obtaining anticipatory bail to representing clients in Madras High Court, their attorneys are well-equipped to handle any case. Moreover, the staff is knowledgeable, friendly, and dedicated to helping their clients secure justice. Rajendra Law Office's superior service makes them the ideal choice for anyone seeking top-tier legal representation.

Anticipatory Bail Granted for YouTube channel interviewer by Madras High Court

 Madras High Court grants bail for YouTube channel interviewer. The court ordered G. Felix Gerald to file a pledge not to upload objectionable content in the future.

The Madras High Court on Tuesday told an interviewer on her YouTube channel, G. Felix Gerald, 48, a lawyer who named a high-ranking dignitary and identified an offensive person who spoke out against her. granted early bail in the lawsuit against him for uploading an interview with

Judge AD Jagadish Chandira granted the appeal, conditional on the filing of an affidavit by the complainants that they would no longer upload such objectionable content. The judge also ordered him to appear before cybercrime investigators for two weeks to help with the investigation. In their request for AB, the complainant said he was a journalist employed by a Tamil-language YouTube news channel called Red Pix 24X7. He usually interviewed guests "according to procedures and rules" and recorded these conversations. He recently interviewed a lawyer and politician named Geetha. The interview he uploaded to the channel on October 15th. As lawyers, politicians, and educators, interviewees discussed current affairs, politics, women's issues, and corruption. During the interview, she named many high-ranking officials and made some comments. 

 "These innuendos and statements are certainly unknown and unexpected to the interviewer. Neither the broadcaster nor the petitioner as interviewer played any role in the mentions or statements made by Ms. Geetha," he said. He said police officers visited his former home on Oct. 28 and asked about him. , they visited his office and obtained his new home address and other details "under the pretext" of issuing a subpoena, the complainant said, claiming he was under their surveillance. Petitioner, fearing when he might be arrested, asked the court to grant him Anticipatory bail. He also claimed to have removed the interview from the channel for his legal advice and promised not to allow the controversial content to be published in the future.

Police station not prohibited place under OSA, Video recording on premises not offence: Bombay High Court

Mumbai, Oct. 29 (PTI) The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court held that a police station is not included as a restricted place as defined under the Official Secrets Act, and hence videotaping inside a police station is not an offense.

In July this year, a division bench comprising Justices Manish Pidale and Valmiki Menezes quashed a case registered against one Ravindra Upadhyay under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) for recording a video inside a police station in March 2018.

Note: Police station not prohibited place under OSA, video recording on premises, not Offence: Bombay High Court

The bench in its order referred to Section 3 and Section 2(8) of the OSA regarding spying in prohibited places and noted that a police station is not specified as a prohibited place in the Act.

Popular Law Posts

•  DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS (29.01.2018); Rajendra Law office
• Lawyers for Bail Service in Chennai Rajendra Law Office

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS (29.01.2018) ; Rajendra Law office

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS (29.01.2018)

Complaint u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. 

Lodging information with police u/s 154(1) and in case of inaction then reporting matter to SSP concerned, is obligatory for complainant, for passing of an order u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. (2018(1)Criminal Court Cases 243 (Calcutta)

Cr.P.C. 125 - Maintenance - Amendment of petition - Amendment can be allowed. (2016(1) Civil Court Cases 442 (Calcutta)

Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Period of 30 days for issuance of notice starts when `information' was received on visit to Bank - Notice not issued within 30 days of receiving `information' about dishonour of cheque - Complaint quashed. (2014(1) Criminal Court Cases 430 (S.C.)

Dying declaration - Can be made at any time and in the presence of anyone. (2016(3) Criminal Court Cases 720 (H.P.)

Leading questions - Should be allowed to be put to the witness - However, impact of leading questions, if any, should be assessed considering the facts of each case. (2018(1) Criminal Court Cases 049 (Gujarat)

Marriage 

 During subsistence of first marriage of wife - Void - Either party may seek marriage to be a nullity - However, situations, may arise when recourse to a court for a declaration regarding the nullity of marriage, claimed by one of the spouses to be a void marriage, will have to be insisted upon in departure to the normal rule. (2013(1) Apex Court Judgments 079 (S.C.)

Private complaint 

- Impleadment of stranger - Not permissible. (2014(1) Criminal Court Cases 030 (Kerala)

Rebuttal evidence - Additional issue framed after closure of evidence by plaintiff - Plaintiff allowed to lead rebuttal evidence. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 079 (P&H)

Registration 

- Transfer of ownership - No antecedent title vested in transferees - In absence of registration, document is nullity in the eyes of law. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 108 (Allahabad)

Service - Appointment only after police verification - Order set aside as police verification takes lot of time - However, appointments shall be subject to police verification. (2016(1) Apex Court Judgments 030 (S.C.)

Contact Rajendra Law office : http://www.lawyerchennai.com

Lawyers for Bail Service in Chennai

lawyers for bail in Chennai

Getting a Bail service is offered by Rajendra law office in chennai. What ever complicated the case is, Our Criminal lawyers can provide bail services.

Criminal Lawyers for Bail service in Chennai

Lawyers for Anticipatory Bails in Chennai

Anticipatory bails can be easily obtained by our Criminal Advocates dealing with criminal cases in Chennai.

Criminal Advocates specializing in Bail Services at Chennai  : +91-9994287060

Visit : http://www.lawyerchennai.com/